I just listened to National Chief Atleo's interview with APTN.
Here is the link to the newsclip: http://aptn.ca/pages/news/2011/06/10/atleo-putting-hopes-into-action-plan-agreement-with-conservatives/
National Chief Atleo is speaking like a leader! He is talking about honouring our Treaty rights, First Nations jurisdiction, holding First Nations leaders accountable to their people, and moving beyond the Indian Act!!
Way to go Mr. Atleo!!
WHO IS WATCHING OUT FOR YOU?
Monday, June 13, 2011
Message for Lorne Gunter. You are wrong!
Lorne Gunter gave his political opinion about the state of First Nations affairs in the Edmonton Journal on June 12, 2011. I am not going to comment on his article because it is the most uninformed article that I've read in awhile.
Specifically, he said, "Ottawa needs to provide more consistent funding -over three to five years, rather than year-to-year -and be clearer about performance standards and what constitutes success. Meanwhile, on-reserve politicians need to give up the fantasy that their tiny communities are nations and need to be dealt with as such.
Until reserves begin to function as municipalities, First Nations destitution will remain."
Do not listen to Lorne Gunter for he knows nothing about the state of Aboriginal affairs. If he did, he would have advised the public that the federal government of Canada and the Indian Act is the problem, not the First Nations, and that as long as the Indian Act remains in place, there is not any amount of money or funding cycles that will reduce the poverty in our communities.
If Lorne knew what he was talking about, he would advised you that "self-government", not municipality-type governance, is the only action that will reduce the poverty in First Nations. The Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development studied this issue and drew that conclusion.
It is views like Lorne Gunter's that perpetuate racism and stereotypes of First Nations people.
Lorne, the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) is a good starting point for you to educate yourself on Aboriginal issues. After you read RCAP, read the Treaties because it will give you a VERY good idea about how the federal government is ignoring international treaties, which is detrimental to the interests of First Nations people, and which maintains the oppression and poverty among First Nations people.
Here is the link to the article: http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Money+solve+aboriginal+problems/4933242/story.html
WHO IS WATCHING OUT FOR YOU?
Specifically, he said, "Ottawa needs to provide more consistent funding -over three to five years, rather than year-to-year -and be clearer about performance standards and what constitutes success. Meanwhile, on-reserve politicians need to give up the fantasy that their tiny communities are nations and need to be dealt with as such.
Until reserves begin to function as municipalities, First Nations destitution will remain."
Do not listen to Lorne Gunter for he knows nothing about the state of Aboriginal affairs. If he did, he would have advised the public that the federal government of Canada and the Indian Act is the problem, not the First Nations, and that as long as the Indian Act remains in place, there is not any amount of money or funding cycles that will reduce the poverty in our communities.
If Lorne knew what he was talking about, he would advised you that "self-government", not municipality-type governance, is the only action that will reduce the poverty in First Nations. The Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development studied this issue and drew that conclusion.
It is views like Lorne Gunter's that perpetuate racism and stereotypes of First Nations people.
Lorne, the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) is a good starting point for you to educate yourself on Aboriginal issues. After you read RCAP, read the Treaties because it will give you a VERY good idea about how the federal government is ignoring international treaties, which is detrimental to the interests of First Nations people, and which maintains the oppression and poverty among First Nations people.
Here is the link to the article: http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Money+solve+aboriginal+problems/4933242/story.html
WHO IS WATCHING OUT FOR YOU?
Thursday, June 9, 2011
The "National Chief" of the AFN is at it again!
APTN reports that the "Assembly of First Nations (AFN) National Chief Shawn Atleo and Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Duncan have agreed to a plan that seems to set the stage for an historic meeting between Prime Minister Stephen Harper and First Nations chiefs."
Here is the link: http://aptn.ca/pages/news/2011/06/09/atleo-duncan-agreement-to-set-stage-for-pm-meeting-with-chiefs/.
What is so historic about the Minister of "Aboriginal" or "Indian" Affairs (whatever name the feds use) holding a meeting with his mascot, the National Chief of the AFN, and the Prime Minister? Nothing. The federal government will be meeting with itself through the National Chief. The Minister of Indian Affairs uses his mascot, the National Chief, to soothe the Chiefs, on the ground, into submission and the Chiefs fall for it. The only historic thing about this meeting will be that I actually get to watch the whole thing unfold and blog on the internet that the federal government's mascot is screwing us over yet again.
Yayyyy for the meeting...now the "National Chief" can continue his reign of oppression over our people! Let's give him a big round of applause for supporting federal policies that are detrimental to the interests of the people, ie. specific claims, Bill C-3, education, health, and tripartite agreements, etc.
Why doesn't the National Chief try something different for a change and say the word "sovereignty"? Come on Atleo, you can do it! Tell yourself, "I think I can", "I think I can", and enunciate after me, "SO-VER- EIGN-TY". It's not a bad word. It actually sounds pretty good when it rolls off your tongue! SO-VER-EIGN-TY. There you go! SOVEREIGNTY.
Oh I know, maybe Bruce Carson and former "National Chief" Phil Fontaine can co-ordinate the meeting?! They can reignite their relationship and hire their non-Aboriginal spouses to implement Harper/Atleo's "Aboriginal" agenda and receive big bucks for their work.
Of course National Chief Atleo is praising the meeting. He will get to continue receiving a whopping $136K+ tax-free salary and never have to step foot on a reserve while the rest of us have to fight the federal government for our treaty right to tax exemption. While Atleo continues to receive a $136K tax-free income, "his" people will continue to be unemployed and live in poverty. If Atleo is so selfless, why doesn't he give up his income tax exemption until the rest of us get the same benefit? Atleo's office will receive the money to co-ordinate the meeting and, in turn, will feed their friends in the Aboriginal industry while the people continue to live in poverty and remain unemployed. Same old...same old.
National Chief Atleo is encouraging us to vote in federal/provincial elections. Why doesn't he allow us to vote in the elections for National Chief????
Well Chiefs, don't say that I didn't warn you.
WHO IS WATCHING OUT FOR YOU AND OUR CHILDREN?
Here is the link: http://aptn.ca/pages/news/2011/06/09/atleo-duncan-agreement-to-set-stage-for-pm-meeting-with-chiefs/.
What is so historic about the Minister of "Aboriginal" or "Indian" Affairs (whatever name the feds use) holding a meeting with his mascot, the National Chief of the AFN, and the Prime Minister? Nothing. The federal government will be meeting with itself through the National Chief. The Minister of Indian Affairs uses his mascot, the National Chief, to soothe the Chiefs, on the ground, into submission and the Chiefs fall for it. The only historic thing about this meeting will be that I actually get to watch the whole thing unfold and blog on the internet that the federal government's mascot is screwing us over yet again.
Yayyyy for the meeting...now the "National Chief" can continue his reign of oppression over our people! Let's give him a big round of applause for supporting federal policies that are detrimental to the interests of the people, ie. specific claims, Bill C-3, education, health, and tripartite agreements, etc.
Why doesn't the National Chief try something different for a change and say the word "sovereignty"? Come on Atleo, you can do it! Tell yourself, "I think I can", "I think I can", and enunciate after me, "SO-VER- EIGN-TY". It's not a bad word. It actually sounds pretty good when it rolls off your tongue! SO-VER-EIGN-TY. There you go! SOVEREIGNTY.
Oh I know, maybe Bruce Carson and former "National Chief" Phil Fontaine can co-ordinate the meeting?! They can reignite their relationship and hire their non-Aboriginal spouses to implement Harper/Atleo's "Aboriginal" agenda and receive big bucks for their work.
Of course National Chief Atleo is praising the meeting. He will get to continue receiving a whopping $136K+ tax-free salary and never have to step foot on a reserve while the rest of us have to fight the federal government for our treaty right to tax exemption. While Atleo continues to receive a $136K tax-free income, "his" people will continue to be unemployed and live in poverty. If Atleo is so selfless, why doesn't he give up his income tax exemption until the rest of us get the same benefit? Atleo's office will receive the money to co-ordinate the meeting and, in turn, will feed their friends in the Aboriginal industry while the people continue to live in poverty and remain unemployed. Same old...same old.
National Chief Atleo is encouraging us to vote in federal/provincial elections. Why doesn't he allow us to vote in the elections for National Chief????
Well Chiefs, don't say that I didn't warn you.
WHO IS WATCHING OUT FOR YOU AND OUR CHILDREN?
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
Message for Duncan and Harper - I am an "Indian" under the Indian Act!
You are not going to disenfranchise Minnie Iserhoff's family from the Indian Act in 2011 without telling us. I have a right to know the details of the protest review that the Department of Indian Affairs is undertaking pursuant to section 14 of the Indian Act regarding our right to registration as Status Indians under the Indian Act.
I am a Cree woman and the Indian Act is a racist piece of legislation that should be repealed in its entirety and not replaced. We have acquired rights under the Indian Act that you cannot unilaterally withdraw without due process.
I submitted an Access to Information request in March 2010 for the contents of my personal file, my mother's, Helen Iserhoff, and my deceased grandmother's file, Minnie Iserhoff, at the Department of Indian Affairs and they are not releasing that information to me. Why are you keeping my file a secret? Did Indian Affairs already disenfranchise me without informing me? I have a right to know that information.
My children and many of my nieces, nephews, and cousins are excluded from Bill C-3 and they have a right to be registered as Indians under the Indian Act.
My great grandfather, Samuel Iserhoff, actually signed Treaty 9 in July 1905. You cannot say that we are not "Indians"!
WHO IS WATCHING OUT FOR YOU AND OUR CHILDREN?
I am a Cree woman and the Indian Act is a racist piece of legislation that should be repealed in its entirety and not replaced. We have acquired rights under the Indian Act that you cannot unilaterally withdraw without due process.
I submitted an Access to Information request in March 2010 for the contents of my personal file, my mother's, Helen Iserhoff, and my deceased grandmother's file, Minnie Iserhoff, at the Department of Indian Affairs and they are not releasing that information to me. Why are you keeping my file a secret? Did Indian Affairs already disenfranchise me without informing me? I have a right to know that information.
My children and many of my nieces, nephews, and cousins are excluded from Bill C-3 and they have a right to be registered as Indians under the Indian Act.
My great grandfather, Samuel Iserhoff, actually signed Treaty 9 in July 1905. You cannot say that we are not "Indians"!
WHO IS WATCHING OUT FOR YOU AND OUR CHILDREN?
Monday, June 6, 2011
A Message for Kelly McParland regarding Brigitte Depape!
Kelly McParland calls Brigitte DePape "self-interested" for being strategic and having the guts to carry a "Stop Harper" sign in the House during the Governor General's speech on Friday, June 1, 2011. Those who speak out and are different from the status quo often get labelled as "self-interested" by those people who are jealous and want the attention for themselves.
Brigitte chose to get her point across by a different path and got the message across, which is one of the goals of activisim. So what? It does not mean that she is self-interested. She is taking action.
Why doesn't Kelly McParland do something about her own causes and use her editorials to educate the public on important societal issues instead of trashing a 21 yr old young woman like DePape in the newspaper for taking action on her political views?!
Brigitte DePape is a fine young role model for young women! More women should follow suit!
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/06/05/kelly-mcparland-cancel-the-election-results-brigette-depape-is-not-happy/
WHO IS WATCHING OUT FOR YOU?
Brigitte chose to get her point across by a different path and got the message across, which is one of the goals of activisim. So what? It does not mean that she is self-interested. She is taking action.
Why doesn't Kelly McParland do something about her own causes and use her editorials to educate the public on important societal issues instead of trashing a 21 yr old young woman like DePape in the newspaper for taking action on her political views?!
Brigitte DePape is a fine young role model for young women! More women should follow suit!
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/06/05/kelly-mcparland-cancel-the-election-results-brigette-depape-is-not-happy/
WHO IS WATCHING OUT FOR YOU?
Saturday, June 4, 2011
Friday, June 3, 2011
Indian Affairs's letter regarding my registration as a Status Indian
Someone posted a question on my previous blog regarding Harper's vindictiveness and retaliation against me for speaking out against his discriminatory policies. She asked me, "Why is it just the women that you are so focused on? What about your male family members who are also being discriminated against? Also, how do you know that it is actually Harper who is specifically coming after you? Do you have any proof that you and your families registration is being reviewed because of your outspokenness and that INAC is being spiteful directly towards you?"
This is a copy of the letter dated April 20, 2011 that Indian Affairs sent to a non-status Indian who applied for registration as a Status Indian:
"Dear XXXXX
This is to inform you that a member of your family has submitted a protest under section 14 of the Indian Act regarding the members of the family of Minnie Iserhoff and their descendants. We are in the process of determining the right to registration of this family.
Once the protest review is completed, I will be in a position to process your application.
Yours Sincerely
Allan Tallman
Indian Registrar
OTTAWA ON K1A 0H4"
Allan Tallman signed the letter and I have a hard copy of this letter in my hands as I blog. I am Minnie Iserhoff's grand-daughter and I am a Status Indian as are many of my cousins, and Mr. Allan Tallman did not notify any of Minnie's descendants that their right to status was being re-determined. When were they going to tell me that this review was taking place? Why is Indian Affairs keeping this protest a secret? I have a right to this information.
The letter is dated April 20, 2011. Indian Affairs cannot use the excuse that they were too busy to tell us about the protest when they took the time on April 20, 2011 to notify a non-status Indian. Surely, Indian Affairs could have performed a quick search of Minnie's file and notified us. In the federal government, a letter that goes out to the public is sent up and down the system for a review a few times before it is approved.
Indian Affairs has stated publically that they will not take away anyone's status as an "Indian" under the Indian Act. Why are they reviewing my file in secret????
Read my blogs. I have been criticizing Harper and Indian Affairs as well as the National Aboriginal Organizations on many of their actions and policies. Form your own opinion as to the reason why Indian Affairs chose to not inform me that they were reviewing my registration as a Status Indian.
Why are the protest provisions in section 14 of the Indian Act still in place when non-Aboriginal women who acquired status through marriage to an "Indian" are protected? Section 14 is discriminatory and should be repealed. It allows Indian Affairs to pick and choose the Aboriginal women and their children that they will disenfranchise or demote. Section 14 allows vindictive Aboriginal people to retaliate against Aboriginal people who are outspoken and perpetuates the community in-fighting that is common place in our communities.
I am focusing on discrimination towards Aboriginal women because the Indian status rules in the Indian Act are designed to discriminate against Aboriginal women who married non-Aboriginal men and their children. So when I say Aboriginal women, it includes Aboriginal men who are the children of these women.
WHO IS WATCHING OUT FOR YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN?
This is a copy of the letter dated April 20, 2011 that Indian Affairs sent to a non-status Indian who applied for registration as a Status Indian:
"Dear XXXXX
This is to inform you that a member of your family has submitted a protest under section 14 of the Indian Act regarding the members of the family of Minnie Iserhoff and their descendants. We are in the process of determining the right to registration of this family.
Once the protest review is completed, I will be in a position to process your application.
Yours Sincerely
Allan Tallman
Indian Registrar
OTTAWA ON K1A 0H4"
Allan Tallman signed the letter and I have a hard copy of this letter in my hands as I blog. I am Minnie Iserhoff's grand-daughter and I am a Status Indian as are many of my cousins, and Mr. Allan Tallman did not notify any of Minnie's descendants that their right to status was being re-determined. When were they going to tell me that this review was taking place? Why is Indian Affairs keeping this protest a secret? I have a right to this information.
The letter is dated April 20, 2011. Indian Affairs cannot use the excuse that they were too busy to tell us about the protest when they took the time on April 20, 2011 to notify a non-status Indian. Surely, Indian Affairs could have performed a quick search of Minnie's file and notified us. In the federal government, a letter that goes out to the public is sent up and down the system for a review a few times before it is approved.
Indian Affairs has stated publically that they will not take away anyone's status as an "Indian" under the Indian Act. Why are they reviewing my file in secret????
Read my blogs. I have been criticizing Harper and Indian Affairs as well as the National Aboriginal Organizations on many of their actions and policies. Form your own opinion as to the reason why Indian Affairs chose to not inform me that they were reviewing my registration as a Status Indian.
Why are the protest provisions in section 14 of the Indian Act still in place when non-Aboriginal women who acquired status through marriage to an "Indian" are protected? Section 14 is discriminatory and should be repealed. It allows Indian Affairs to pick and choose the Aboriginal women and their children that they will disenfranchise or demote. Section 14 allows vindictive Aboriginal people to retaliate against Aboriginal people who are outspoken and perpetuates the community in-fighting that is common place in our communities.
I am focusing on discrimination towards Aboriginal women because the Indian status rules in the Indian Act are designed to discriminate against Aboriginal women who married non-Aboriginal men and their children. So when I say Aboriginal women, it includes Aboriginal men who are the children of these women.
WHO IS WATCHING OUT FOR YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)